Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz ; 117: e220125, 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1406003

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Trypanosoma cruzi shows an exuberant genetic diversity. Currently, seven phylogenetic lineages, called discrete typing units (DTUs), are recognised: TcI-TcVI and Tcbat. Despite advances in studies on T. cruzi and its populations, there is no consensus regarding its heterogeneity. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to perform molecular characterisation of T. cruzi strains, isolated in the state of São Paulo, to identify the DTUs involved and evaluate their genetic diversity. METHODS T. cruzi strains were isolated from biological samples of chronic chagasic patients, marsupials and triatomines through culture techniques and subjected to molecular characterisation using the fluorescent fragment length barcoding (FFLB) technique. Subsequently, the results were correlated with complementary information to enable better discrimination between the identified DTUs. FINDINGS It was possible to identify TcI in two humans and two triatomines; TcII/VI in 19 humans, two marsupials and one triatomine; and TcIII in one human host, an individual that also presented a result for TcI, which indicated the possibility of a mixed infection. Regarding the strains characterised by the TcII/VI profile, the correlation with complementary information allowed to suggest that, in general, these parasite populations indeed correspond to the TcII genotype. MAIN CONCLUSIONS The TcII/VI profile, associated with domestic cycles and patients with chronic Chagas disease, was the most prevalent among the identified DTUs. Furthermore, the correlation of the study results with complementary information made it possible to suggest that TcII is the predominant lineage of this work.

3.
Acta neurol. colomb ; 32(3): 184-189, jul.-set. 2016. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-827679

ABSTRACT

Introducción: el síndrome de Guillain Barré es considerada una de las principales causas de parálisis neuromuscular aguda. Actualmente existen dos alternativas igual de efectivas clínicamente en el tratamiento de esta enfermedad: la inmunoglobulina intravenosa y la plasmaféresis. Objetivo: estimar cuál de los dos tratamientos es menos costoso en la atención hospitalaria de pacientes con diagnóstico de síndrome de Guillain Barré en estadios moderados a severos en la Fundación Cardioinfantil en Bogotá, Colombia. Materiales y métodos: se incluyeron todos los pacientes que egresaron entre enero y diciembre de 2014 con síndrome de Guillain Barré según el sistema de información clínica de la Fundación Cardioinfantil. La información de los costos por cada paciente fue provista por el Departamento de Cuentas Médicas de la Fundación Cardioinfantil y se estableció el costo total de la atención desde el ingreso hasta el egreso del paciente. La comparación del costo total de la atención de los pacientes tratados con inmunoglobulina intravenosa (IGIV) vs., los pacientes tratados con plasmaféresis, se realizó por medio de la prueba de Mann-Whitney. Resultados: la atención de los pacientes con IGIV tuvo un costo total de 9.976 USD, mientras el costo de los pacientes tratados con plasmaféresis fue de 23.354 USD. El costo de atención en este último grupo de pacientes se ve afectado por el mayor número de complicaciones derivadas del mismo tratamiento. Conclusión: entre los dos tratamientos considerados en el síndrome de Guillain Barré en estadios avanzados, la IGIV ofrece una buena alternativa para minimizar costos en la atención hospitalaria del paciente con diagnóstico de síndrome de Gullian Barré en la Fundación Cardioinfantil de Bogotá.


Introduction: Guillain Barre Syndrome is considered one of the most important causes of acute neuromuscular paralysis. Currently there are two clinically effective therapies for the treatment of disease: IVIG and plasmapheresis. Objective: To estimate which therapy is less expensive for the in-hospital care of patients diagnosed with moderate to severe Guillain Barre in the Fundación Cardioinfantil of Bogotá, Colombia. Materials and Methods: All patients that were discharged between January and December 2014 with GuillainBarre syndrome diagnosis were included. The cost information for each patient was provided by department of medical bills and the total cost of care was established from admission to patient discharge. The comparison of the total costs of care of patients treated with IVIG vs. patients treated with plasmapheresis was performed by means of the Mann-Whitney analysis. Results: The cost of care of patients with intravenous immunoglobulin was 9,976 USD while the total cost of patients with plasmapheresis was 23,354 USD. The higher cost of care in this last group of patients was driven by the increased number of complications arising from the same treatment. Conclusion:Between the two treatments considered in the advanced states of Guillain Barre Syndrome, IVIG offers an adequate strategy to minimize the cost of hospital patient care in patients with a diagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the Fundación Cardioinfantil of Bogotá.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL